2
May 6, 2025
495362112_1116324983864752_1270014367830147616_n
If passed, HB30 would require the judge of probate of each county to conduct a post-election audit after every county and statewide general election to determine the accuracy of the originally reported results of the election.
The legislation passed the House in March, but still faces some obstacles in the Senate. It also has the support of State Auditor Andrew Sorrell and Secretary of State Wes Allen.

As the 2025 Alabama legislative session nears its conclusion, State Representative Debbie Wood (R-Valley) is intensifying efforts to pass House Bill 30, known as the Alabama Post-Election Audit Act. With only three days remaining in the regular session, the bill’s fate hangs in the balance, potentially marking a pivotal moment for election transparency in the state.

The proposed legislation mandates that probate judges in each of Alabama’s 67 counties conduct post-election audits after every county and statewide general election. Specifically, the bill requires an audit of ballots from one randomly selected precinct in a countywide or statewide race. The audit aims to verify the accuracy of election results and ensure public confidence in the electoral process.

Rep. Wood has emphasized the importance of such audits, stating, “Post-election audits ensure public confidence in the election process. Audits increase transparency and demonstrate that elections are fair and accurate” . She further highlighted that Alabama is one of the few states without a mandated post-election audit process, underscoring the need for such measures to uphold the integrity of the state’s elections.

The bill has already passed the Alabama House of Representatives with a vote of 63 in favor, 30 against, and seven abstentions. However, its passage in the Senate remains uncertain, with time running out in the current legislative session.

Supporters of the bill argue that post-election audits are essential for verifying the accuracy of election results and enhancing voter confidence. They point to instances where close races and potential discrepancies in vote counts could be clarified through such audits. Additionally, proponents contend that implementing regular audits would align Alabama with best practices observed in other states, fostering greater transparency and trust in the electoral system.

Opponents of the bill raise concerns about the potential costs and logistical challenges associated with conducting post-election audits. Some argue that the resources required for such audits could be better allocated elsewhere, especially considering the state’s budget constraints. Others question the necessity of audits, citing the absence of widespread evidence of election fraud in Alabama.

Despite these challenges, Rep. Wood remains steadfast in her commitment to advancing the bill. She has worked diligently to address concerns and build bipartisan support for the measure. In a statement, she emphasized, “We have a responsibility to ensure that every vote counts and that the ones that shouldn’t be there are not” .

As the legislative session draws to a close, all eyes are on the Alabama Senate to determine whether the Post-Election Audit Act will become law. If enacted, the legislation could set a precedent for other states considering similar measures to enhance election transparency and integrity.

In the coming days, lawmakers will face critical decisions that could shape the future of Alabama’s electoral process. The outcome of House Bill 30 may not only influence state election practices but also serve as a bellwether for national discussions on election security and reform.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3