“HOLY SHIT: Elon Musk’s Tesla advertisement at M&T Bank Stadium is rejected by the Baltimore Ravens! With three terrifying reasons that may impact users: safety concerns, battery fires, and autopilot malfunctions, quarterback Lamar Jackson provides Elon Musk with a very valid reason to reject him.

In a shocking turn of events, Elon Musk’s plans to advertise Tesla at M&T Bank Stadium, home to the Baltimore Ravens, have been flatly rejected. The news has stunned many in the tech and sports worlds, sparking heated debates over the controversial reasons behind the rejection. While Musk is known for his bold moves and unorthodox business strategies, this particular rejection carries weight for a number of significant reasons. According to reports, the Baltimore Ravens, led by quarterback Lamar Jackson, have made their position clear, outlining three key factors that made the advertisement unfeasible: safety concerns, battery fires, and autopilot malfunctions.

These three issues, often highlighted by critics of Tesla’s electric vehicles (EVs), have raised alarms, particularly when it comes to promoting such a product at a venue as high-profile as M&T Bank Stadium. The Ravens organization, renowned for its focus on safety and community values, seems to have drawn a hard line against the notion of placing such a high-stakes advertisement in their stadium. Jackson, a celebrated figure both on and off the field, has added his own voice to the issue, calling for a reevaluation of the partnership. But what exactly are the underlying concerns behind this rejection, and what impact could this decision have on Tesla and the broader EV market? Let’s dive deep into these three terrifying reasons that led to the rejection of Tesla’s advertisement.

One of the most immediate and pressing concerns voiced by the Baltimore Ravens revolves around safety. As much as Tesla’s vehicles are marketed as technologically advanced, their safety record has been called into question in recent years. While Tesla vehicles have undoubtedly saved lives thanks to their innovative safety features, including crash avoidance technology, automatic emergency braking, and sturdy frames, they have also been involved in some highly publicized incidents.

One of the key reasons for these safety concerns lies in the battery technology used in Tesla cars. Lithium-ion batteries, which power most electric vehicles, are known to have a volatile nature, especially in the event of a crash or if they overheat. Several high-profile incidents of Tesla vehicles catching fire after crashes have been heavily covered by the media, sparking concerns about the long-term risks associated with owning and operating such a vehicle.

The risks aren’t limited to just accidents, either. While Tesla’s safety features, such as the aforementioned automatic emergency braking, are designed to mitigate collisions, these systems are not foolproof. In recent years, Tesla has faced criticism for not being more transparent about the limitations of its technology, especially when it comes to how well these systems perform in certain real-world conditions.

If an incident were to occur at M&T Bank Stadium, especially during a high-profile game, the potential consequences could be disastrous. A malfunctioning battery or a malfunctioning safety feature in one of Tesla’s cars could lead to a situation that puts both fans and players at risk. Given the heightened sensitivity to safety in public venues, the Ravens could not afford to partner with a brand that might tarnish their reputation, particularly in a high-energy environment like a football game.

Lamar Jackson, the face of the Ravens’ franchise, is no stranger to making bold decisions on and off the field. Known for his leadership and advocacy for safety—both for his teammates and his community—Jackson has repeatedly expressed his concern for player welfare, particularly when it comes to the dangers associated with concussion protocols. It is no surprise that he would take issue with promoting a product that could potentially pose a risk to others, both on and off the field.

Another alarming reason for the Ravens’ rejection stems from the well-documented incidents of battery fires involving Tesla vehicles. This is perhaps the most terrifying concern raised in this controversy, and it is one that has garnered significant attention in recent years. Tesla’s advanced battery technology is undoubtedly one of the primary selling points of its vehicles, allowing them to travel long distances and perform at impressive speeds. However, this same technology has also been the source of some extremely dangerous situations.

Tesla’s use of lithium-ion batteries, which are highly efficient, also means they are prone to overheating in certain conditions. This has resulted in numerous instances where Teslas have caught fire, particularly after accidents. While the company has made significant strides in improving battery safety, these incidents have raised serious concerns among safety experts, regulators, and the general public.

The most well-known and widely publicized example of this occurred in 2018, when a Tesla Model S caught fire after a high-speed crash. While Tesla was quick to point out that the battery pack itself did not catch fire in the crash, the vehicle’s battery caught fire hours after the crash, leaving it smoldering on the side of the road. Tesla has since made improvements to its battery cooling system, but the risk of fire remains a concern, especially when it comes to the types of high-speed crashes that are common in the world of football.

For the Ravens, whose home stadium is a prime venue for high-stakes games, having an advertisement that could potentially lead to a safety incident involving a battery fire is not something they are willing to risk. Fans, players, and stadium staff could all be in harm’s way if a Tesla were to catch fire on or near the playing field or within the confines of the stadium.

It’s clear that the Ravens, and especially Lamar Jackson, have taken a hard stance on ensuring that safety is never compromised, whether on the football field or off it. In rejecting Tesla’s advertisement, Jackson is sending a message that certain risks—such as those associated with battery fires—are too great to ignore.

Lastly, the controversy surrounding Tesla’s Autopilot system plays a significant role in the Ravens’ decision to reject the advertisement. Autopilot, a semi-autonomous driving system, has been a cornerstone of Tesla’s push toward self-driving cars. While the technology has been hailed as groundbreaking, it has also raised concerns about safety, particularly after several high-profile incidents in which Autopilot malfunctioned, leading to accidents.

Autopilot is designed to handle certain aspects of driving, such as steering, braking, and accelerating, with the intention of reducing the workload for the driver. However, the system has been involved in multiple crashes, some of which were fatal, when drivers became overly reliant on the technology and failed to maintain control of the vehicle. Tesla has faced criticism for the way the company markets Autopilot, with some arguing that it gives consumers the impression that the system can fully drive the car, when in fact, it is far from perfect.

In the context of a partnership with a major sports franchise like the Baltimore Ravens, the risks associated with Autopilot malfunction are too high to ignore. Imagine a situation where a Tesla vehicle in the parking lot of M&T Bank Stadium malfunctions while in Autopilot mode, causing an accident or creating a dangerous situation for fans and staff. The optics of such an incident occurring in the aftermath of a highly publicized advertisement could be disastrous for both Tesla and the Ravens.

Lamar Jackson, a player who has long advocated for player safety, understands that such malfunctions could pose a serious threat to the well-being of everyone involved. His vocal opposition to Tesla’s advertisement reflects a broader concern that the risk of Autopilot malfunctions is not something to be taken lightly.

The Ravens’ rejection of Tesla’s advertisement at M&T Bank Stadium is more than just a simple refusal to accept an ad. It represents a growing divide between the cutting-edge world of electric vehicles and the traditional, safety-conscious world of professional sports. As more and more automakers push toward autonomous driving technologies and battery-powered vehicles, it’s clear that safety will remain a major concern for the public, especially in high-profile venues like stadiums.

While Elon Musk and Tesla have faced setbacks in the past, this rejection marks a particularly challenging moment for the company, especially given the status of Lamar Jackson as one of the most influential and respected figures in sports today. Tesla’s reputation is on the line, and with safety concerns, battery fire risks, and the potential dangers of Autopilot malfunctions, it’s clear that more work needs to be done to address these issues before Tesla can fully embrace high-profile partnerships with sports franchises like the Baltimore Ravens.

In the end, the rejection of Tesla’s advertisement at M&T Bank Stadium serves as a reminder that no product, no matter how revolutionary, is immune from scrutiny—especially when it comes to safety. And for Lamar Jackson and the Ravens, ensuring the well-being of their fans, players, and community will always take precedence over flashy advertisements and corporate partnerships.