TRANSFER TREMORS: Oklahoma’s Jaren Kanak Pushed to the Sidelines as Clemson Sends Clear Signal to Brent Venables—Sooner Tight End’s Future Now Clouded in Uncertainty
The news surrounding Oklahoma Sooners tight end Jaren Kanak has sent a jolt through Norman and beyond, marking what appears to be a seismic shift in the dynamics of Brent Venables’ evolving roster. Once considered a rising contributor to the Sooners’ offensive schemes, Kanak now finds himself on the outside looking in—a stark contrast to the expectations placed upon him at the start of his journey in crimson and cream. The buzz intensified when the Clemson Tigers, a familiar program to Coach Venables from his long and impactful tenure there, sent a clear and deliberate message to the Oklahoma staff that only fueled speculation about Kanak’s immediate future and broader implications for the Sooners’ plans moving forward.
Jaren Kanak’s story began as a highly-touted, versatile athlete whose high school career in Kansas drew the attention of several Power Five programs. With explosive athleticism, excellent work ethic, and a team-first mentality, Kanak fit the mold of what many programs seek in a modern tight end or hybrid linebacker—a rare breed of player able to adapt to different systems and roles. He originally committed to Clemson under Venables’ defensive eye but flipped to Oklahoma following Venables’ departure to take the head coaching job. That connection made Kanak’s move west logical at the time, and expectations were sky-high as he joined a program looking to reclaim national prominence under its new leadership.
Fast forward to the present, and the circumstances have taken a dramatic turn. Kanak, once heralded for his potential to anchor multiple phases of play on both offense and defense, is now seeing his name surface in transfer talks and internal depth chart reshuffling. Reports indicate he has been pushed out of the rotation, with younger and more specialized players rising quickly in Oklahoma’s revamped offensive scheme. Tight end reps have shifted to emerging stars who are not only more refined in route running and pass-catching but also offer unique mismatches that the Sooners’ current game plan seeks to exploit.
Brent Venables, whose leadership has been under scrutiny after an up-and-down first couple of seasons, finds himself in a tough position with Kanak. The head coach must walk a fine line between loyalty to the players who followed him to Oklahoma and the cold reality of needing to build a championship-contending roster in the hyper-competitive SEC. With the Sooners preparing to make the full jump into SEC competition, every personnel decision carries increased weight, and the coaching staff is clearly focused on fielding the most explosive, dynamic roster possible—even if that means former favorites are left behind.
What adds an intriguing layer to this saga is the involvement of Clemson. Sources close to both programs have confirmed that the Tigers have been in communication with Kanak’s camp and that a message—whether formal or informal—was relayed to Coach Venables. Though no public statements have been made, the sentiment from Clemson appears to be one of interest, perhaps even a subtle recruitment back to the program where Kanak originally pledged his talents. If so, it would represent not only a potential return to familiar territory for the player but also a symbolic shift, as one of Venables’ earliest recruits at Oklahoma could make his way back to the program Venables once helped shape.
Kanak’s situation has stirred debate among fans and analysts. On one hand, there’s sympathy for a player who seems to have done everything right—he worked hard, stayed loyal, and remained coachable. On the other hand, some argue that his hybrid role may no longer suit the direction Oklahoma’s staff is heading. The Sooners are looking to streamline roles and build a more SEC-caliber team that excels in specialization and elite execution, traits Kanak may not be fully aligned with given his tweener skill set.
The bigger question, however, is what this means for Oklahoma’s internal dynamics. If a player like Kanak—long viewed as a foundational piece—can find himself sidelined so suddenly, what message does that send to others within the program? The answer depends on perspective. To some, it’s a sign of a maturing and ruthlessly competitive culture, where no player is safe and only the best rise. To others, it may raise concerns about inconsistency, communication gaps, or a lack of player development clarity under the current regime.
The message from Clemson only adds to the intrigue. Whether it was a simple inquiry about Kanak’s availability or a more pointed message about the Tigers’ willingness to welcome him back, it undeniably puts pressure on Venables. The head coach is now caught between preserving relationships from his past and carving a future that may require difficult separations from players who believed in him early on. The connection to Clemson can’t be understated either—Venables helped build that culture, and seeing it potentially reclaim one of his former Oklahoma recruits would underscore just how connected the world of college football remains, especially between elite programs with overlapping coaching trees.
For Kanak himself, this juncture could be either a low point or a fresh beginning. The transfer portal remains an option, and it would likely be filled with suitors. Kanak’s athletic profile, positional flexibility, and familiarity with multiple schemes make him a fit for a variety of systems. Clemson could represent the most emotionally logical choice, but programs across the Big Ten, ACC, or even lower-tier SEC squads would likely see Kanak as a valuable addition. His ability to contribute immediately, whether as a tight end or hybrid defender, would not be lost on coaches seeking depth and versatility.
Beyond the x’s and o’s, there is also a human side to this story. For any player to face the reality of being “the odd man out” is a difficult and humbling experience. For Kanak, who trusted a coaching staff enough to follow them across programs, the shift must feel especially personal. College football, despite its business-like evolution, still runs on relationships and trust, and moments like these test both in significant ways.
In Norman, the fanbase has begun to digest the news in a variety of ways. Social media has been filled with speculation, support, and frustration. Some fans are calling for Venables to clarify the situation publicly, while others are urging Kanak to stay and fight for his spot. Amidst all this, the staff remains mostly silent, sticking to the script and focusing on team unity as fall camp approaches. But silence only invites more questions, and as the calendar moves closer to opening weekend, those questions will become louder.
Clemson, meanwhile, remains the quiet but potent backdrop to the drama. The Tigers have long had a knack for turning second-chance stories into success stories. If Kanak does indeed end up back in orange and purple, it could signal a win-win—revitalization for the player and an asset reclaimed for the program. But if Oklahoma finds a way to re-integrate Kanak or repurpose him into a meaningful role, it could be seen as a masterstroke of roster management.
Either way, the story of Jaren Kanak has become more than just a tale of playing time and depth charts. It’s now a story about loyalty, transition, and the razor-thin line between promise and disappointment in college football’s modern age. As more information comes to light and decisions are made in the coming weeks, the fallout from this revelation could ripple well beyond Norman and Clemson.
Ultimately, what happens next will define how both programs are perceived in terms of culture and player management. For Venables, this is a test of leadership and vision. For Kanak, it’s a chance to rewrite his trajectory, whether that continues in crimson or returns to a familiar shade of orange. The eyes of the college football world will remain fixed on this evolving story, waiting to see where one of the Sooners’ most intriguing figures lands next—and what message that decision ultimately sends to players, fans, and rivals alike.